In mt setup,
Digico Quanrun - DMI 64@96 Dante - Fourier
round trip latency is 4.6ms (64sample)
32 sample. almost 3ms
How about other user?
I measured Smaart V9 using by DVS
Reference latency is 0ms
no insert any plugin, just pass testing
Wasn’t round trip latemcy time 2ms?
SQ-5 with v3 64/64 Dante.
Smaart v.8 with RME Fireface (Offset 0 msec)
Analog in → Input with Dante insert (0.0 msec Plugin) to Master with Dante Insert (0.0 msec Plugin) → Analog out.
In total so analog to analog with two insert of transform.engine
Total 9.0 msec
(Dante Latency 1 msec)
(TE 32 Samples)
9ms is a relatively long trip time.
There’s no issue using it for FOH, but you have to be very careful when using it for monitors. I think 4ms to 9ms is unacceptable for monitor mixes
Yes, it adds up a lot. Monitoring is not possible.
Depending on your setup, it’s definitely possible to create a system with a round-trip-time of less than 9 ms; with 1 ms Dante network latency and 32 sample periods at 96 kHz, we would expect to see a 3 ms total insert latency (1 ms network each way plus 1 ms internal latency), plus whatever latency your console routing or AD/DA conversion is adding. If you’re seeing significantly higher latencies than that, are you running at a lower sample rate perhaps? Have you measured thee insert latency of just your interface?
Today I measured my system too. I´m @48k and have 4.2ms roundtrip through the engine. single mono chain, no plugins. Period Size 32 Samples, Dante 1ms. So the Latency is build as follows I guess?
1ms Dante IN
2.2ms System Latency
1ms Dante OUT
Is that correct? Only way to make it a bit faster is to go to 96k where I could win kind of 0.7ms, right?
Best
Hey,
For period size 32 and 48kHz, would be 4ms round trip latency rather than 4.2ms. (1ms Dante In + 2ms DSP latency + 1ms Dante Out).
At period size 32 and 96kHz, round trip would be 3ms. (1ms Dante In + 2ms DSP latency + 1ms Dante Out).
The 0.2ms, is that possible from the insert delay of the console? Are you comparing like for like?